Difference Between Rijndael And Rijndaelmanaged
Matthew Barrera
Published Apr 10, 2026
Rijndael and RijndaelManaged are two of the popular encryption algorithms available in the world. They are both derived from the same structure, making them similar in many ways. However, there are still some important differences between the two that should be noted. Understanding these differences can help you make a more informed decision when it comes to choosing the right encryption algorithm for your needs.
Encryption Security
Rijndael is a block-cypher encryption algorithm that is considered highly secure. It supports three different key sizes that correspond to 128-bit, 192-bit, and 256-bit data encryption key (DEK). Each of these key sizes employs the same algorithm, but the larger the DEK, the more secure the encryption. RijndaelManaged is a managed version of the original Rijndael algorithm, which means it has the potential for higher levels of security by taking advantage of the .NET Framework’s built-in security features.
RijndaelManaged is also highly secure, but uses different, about equally secure, key sizes than the Rijndael algorithm. These key sizes are 128-bit, 192-bit, and 256-bit key sizes, with a 256-bit key size being considered the most secure. This advanced key size comes with extra security features that make the encrypted data even more secure.
Computational Requirement
Rijndael requires more computational resources to complete its encryption process. This is due to the fact that it needs multiple rounds of encryption that can take more time to process. On the other hand, RijndaelManaged requires fewer resources, as it is written in the .NET language and is better optimized for this purpose.
RijndaelManaged is also better suited for portable devices due to its relatively low computational resources requirement. This makes it well suited for encrypting data on mobile devices or other devices that may have limited computing power.
Key Length
Rijndael supports three different key lengths: 128-bit, 192-bit, and 256-bit DEK. Each of these key lengths have different levels of security depending on the specific encryption algorithm being used. RijndaelManaged, on the other hand, supports 128-bit, 192-bit, 256-bit, and even 512-bit key sizes.
With the support of longer key lengths, RijndaelManaged is more secure than Rijndael. Longer keys result in stronger encryption and can provide better protection of the data being encrypted.
Performance
Both Rijndael and RijndaelManaged have reasonably good encryption speeds. Rijndael does not have a great disadvantage in terms of performance, but due to its reliance on multiple cryptographic rounds, the overall performance can be slower compared to RijndaelManaged. This is because RijndaelManaged has been code optimized in order to provide better performance.
RijndaelManaged achieves increased performance while still being secure. This means that users can benefit from greater computing speeds while still keeping the data secure.
Coding Structure
Rijndael is an unmanaged algorithm, meaning it must be written in an unmanaged language such as C or C++. On the other hand, RijndaelManaged is written in the managed language of C# and is designed to be used in the .NET Framework. This is important because it makes the algorithm much easier to code, which can help speed up the development time.
For developers who do not have experience coding in unmanaged languages, RijndaelManaged is a better option. This is because developers can leverage their existing skills in coding for the .NET Framework and quickly develop encryption applications.
Compatibility Across Platforms
Rijndael has been developed for the Windows operating system. It is, therefore, only compatible with Windows-based platforms. RijndaelManaged, on the other hand, is cross-platform compatible. This means it can be used on a wide range of operating systems, including Windows, Linux, and macOS.
For developers who want their applications to be compatible across different platforms, RijndaelManaged is the better choice. This is because it is available on all major operating systems, making it easy to integrate into existing applications.
Licensing
Rijndael is an open source algorithm and is free to use. On the other hand, RijndaelManaged is a closed source algorithm and is subject to licensing from Microsoft. This means that developers or businesses using the algorithm need to purchase a license before using it. This can be expensive for businesses or developers who are on a tight budget.
Open source algorithms have the advantage of being readily available at no cost, which means the developers or businesses don’t need to pay for the algorithm. As such, Rijndael is a better choice for those who are working on a limited budget.
Conclusion
Rijndael and RijndaelManaged are two popular encryption algorithms that are derived from the same structure. However, there are still some important differences between the two that should be noted. Rijndael is more secure, while RijndaelManaged is more computationally efficient and offers greater key lengths. Developers who prefer the .NET Framework should consider RijndaelManaged while those on a tight budget should opt for Rijndael. Ultimately, the choice between Rijndael and RijndaelManaged should depend on the specific needs of the user.